USDA HB-1-3555, Chapter 9 (Income Analysis), § 9.8

usda-hb-3555-9-8

USDA Handbook HB-1-3555 section 9.8. Full verbatim section text, substring-verified against snapshot f7ae1465abd3b32b.

Get this register: .xlsx .csv More bundles →

Verbatim regulatory text (1)

Verbatim provisions from USDA HB-1-3555, Chapter 9 (Income Analysis), § 9.8 — each quote is a verified substring of the regulator-published source snapshot, not retyped. Quoted for reference; this is not legal advice. The operational layer (P&P updates, prompts) lives in the regulation update kits.

USDA HB-1-3555, Chapter 9 (Income Analysis), § 9.8

Effective 2025-08-05 · USDA chapter revision · Procedure Notice 649

STABLE AND DEPENDABLE INCOME [7 CFR 3555.152(a)] 7 CFR 3555.152(a) and Attachment 9-A assist lenders in reviewing income types. The following guidance also assists lenders to consider repayment income sources: • The income source must be documented. • There must be evidence to support the historical receipt of earnings. • Establish the likelihood of its continuance for at least 3 years into the mortgage. • Analyze any gaps in employment to make a final determination of stable and dependable income. The Agency does not impose specific criteria regarding when a gap in employment is acceptable. It is the approved lender’s responsibility to analyze the complete employment history to determine stable and dependable income. • Caution should be utilized for applicants that have documented declining wages or earnings. Lenders must ensure repayment income is not inflated/overstated. • Caution should be utilized for applicants that have a documented sharp increase in earnings. A sharp increase in earnings is defined as a 20 percent or greater variance in income from the previous 12 months. Lenders must determine if an increase is supported and logical. Examples include, but are not limited to, a promotion with the current employer, documented pay raise, income trend analysis for overtime, bonus, commission, seasonal employees, etc. • Caution should be utilized for applicants that have a documented decrease in earnings. A documented decrease in earnings is defined as a 20 percent or greater variance in income from the previous 12 months. Lenders must determine if the Paragraph 9.8 Stable and Dependable Income decrease has/will continue or if there is evidence to support the earnings have stabilized. Examples include, but are not limited to, loss of job but new employment secured with lower wages, new profession/line of work, loss of contract/clients, economic cycle impact such as real estate, finance/lending, manufacturing, construction, etc. • Lenders may gross up income that is not subject to Federal taxes 25 percent. • Any loss incurred by a self-employed business (full time or part-time) that is closed may be removed from consideration when the applicants provide a letter of explanation and documentation to the lender which details: 1. When the business was closed; 2. Why the business was closed; 3. How the business was closed; and 4. Evidence, satisfactory to the lender, to support the closure of the business. REMINDER: Approved lenders are responsible for their underwriting decisions, which includes the determination of stable and dependable income. Loans that default within 60 months of the date the Loan Note Guarantee is issued may result in indemnification from the approved lender to USDA due to unauthorized underwriting per 7 CFR 3555, HB-1-3555, and additional published USDA guidance.

Source: USDA HB-1-3555, Chapter 9 (Income Analysis), § 9.8 · source URL · snapshot f7ae1465abd3b32b

Operationalizing USDA HB-1-3555, Chapter 9 (Income Analysis), § 9.8

This is verbatim, source-snapshotted regulator text from the Claude for Compliance open corpus. To turn a rule like this into compliance work product: gap-analyze your policies and procedures (P&Ps) against these requirements to surface stale, conflicting, or missing provisions; operationalize any change with a ready-to-run update kit; and produce audit-ready evidence — every step grounded only in the regulator’s own words, never invented.

To work from the whole rulebook rather than this one page: download the corpus — every register on this site, verbatim, each with its source snapshot and effective date — then follow the methodology. It asks your assistant to answer only from the downloaded text, cite the register id and effective date it used, and tell you when the corpus does not cover something instead of filling the gap from memory. Running it locally also means no one sees which regulations you are looking at.

Source of record: https://claudeforcompliance.com/regs/usda-hb-3555-9-8/ · register usda-hb-3555-9-8 · Claude for Compliance. Free to read and download; see regulatory updates and methodology.