Credit standards · Auto loan credit standards

NISSAN AUTO RECEIVABLES

Summary statistics computed from the Form ABS-EE asset-level file for this shelf, filed 2026-08-19. Regulation AB II requires this loan-level data for registered public auto-loan securitizations, so every figure below is a statement about a named, dated SEC filing — not about a company.

1,099 loans analysed, sampled systematically (every 20th record) from 21,990 records. CIK 1941405. Source filing.

Distributions

Measure5th25thMedian75th95th
Credit score692736776827869
APR0.0%1.9%2.5%3.9%5.0%
Payment-to-income2.2%4.4%6.8%9.5%14.8%
Term (months)6061727375
Loan-to-value59.2%85.7%102.9%115.1%128.9%
Vehicle model year20192021202120222022

By credit score band

BandRangeLoansShareMedian APR
near prime 601-660 1 0.1% 3.9%
prime 661-780 563 51.2% 2.9%
super prime 781-900 535 48.7% 1.9%

Pool composition

What this is not

Not underwriting guidelines. Not a comparison of lenders. Not a description of any lender's programs or current practices. Each row describes one securitized pool, as reported in one filing, on one date - a sponsor-selected subset of what an originator funded. Issuers securitizing privately under Rule 144A file no asset-level data and are absent by construction.

Income and employment verification appear in the file only as raw Schedule AL codes (2 and 2). Their meanings are not asserted here — the filer's codebook is the only authority for what a code means, and this shelf published 45 codebook fields.

underwritingIndicator is recorded upstream but omitted here: filers apply it inconsistently and it cannot be read as an exception rate. Verification codes are raw and are not comparable across filers. LTV carries a per-shelf comparability flag.

Method: how these figures are computed. Data generated 2026-08-25 from the filing above.